Skip to main content

Complete Guide: Using the SoCKit - Creating Your Summary of Contributions

Quickfiling US avatar
Written by Quickfiling US
Updated over 2 weeks ago

What is the Summary of Contributions (SOC)?

The Summary of Contributions (SOC) is a critical document for immigration petitions. It's a structured, professional narrative that:

  • Synthesizes your most significant achievements and impact

  • Connects your work to USCIS legal standards

  • Provides exhibit-based evidence for every claim

  • Demonstrates why you deserve the green card

Think of it as your "career highlights reel" written in legal language that USCIS officers understand.

Why SOC Matters - Time is Money!

Immigration attorneys require the SOC before they can start working on your petition. Here's the reality:

Without the SoCKit:

  • Most petitioners take months to collect evidence and draft their SOC

  • Attorneys can't begin drafting your petition until you provide a complete SOC

  • You're paying attorney fees while doing the prep work yourself

  • The process drags on, causing delays and stress

With the SoCKit:

  • Generate a professional, attorney-ready SOC in 6-8 hours of work

  • Your attorney can start working on your case immediately

  • Complete your petition in 1-2 weeks instead of months

  • Save time, reduce stress, and get your green card process moving faster

Bottom line: The sooner you get your SOC ready, the sooner your immigration attorney can work on your case. Don't let evidence collection become a year-long bottleneck!


What the SoCKit Creates

The SoCKit automatically generates TWO essential documents:

1. Index of Exhibits

A professionally organized catalog of all your supporting evidence:

  • Organized by 14 evidence categories

  • Each exhibit numbered (e.g., "Exhibit 3-1", "Exhibit 4-2")

  • Easy for USCIS officers to navigate

  • Matches citations in your Summary of Contributions

2. Summary of Contributions

A comprehensive narrative document covering:

  • Introduction (your background and field importance)

  • Significant Research Contributions (grouped by research themes)

  • High Citation Impact and Recognition

  • Leadership, Critical Roles, and Judging Activities

  • Awards, Grants, and Honors

  • Media Coverage and Implementations

  • Conclusion (overall impact summary)


The 14 Evidence Categories

Your exhibits are organized into these categories:

#

Category

Examples

1

Personal Information

CV, passport, diplomas, I-94

2

Recommendation Letters

Letters from experts in your field

3

Publications & Citations

Papers, patents, citation metrics

4

Awards & Honors

Recognitions, prizes, certificates

5

Funding & Grants

NSF, NIH grants, research funding

6

Media Coverage

Press mentions, interviews, articles

7

Judging/Reviewing

Peer review, editorial board roles

8

Memberships

Professional associations, certifications

9

Presentations & Talks

Invited talks, keynote speeches

10

Adoptions & Implementations

Technology transfer, industry use

11

High Salary

W-2s, pay stubs (if relevant)

12

Employment & Critical Roles

Leadership positions, critical roles

13

Other Supporting Materials

Additional relevant evidence

14

Reputation & Prestige

Conference rankings, journal impact factors


How to Use the SoCKit: Step-by-Step Instructions


Overview of the Process

The SoCKit is a standalone application that helps you create your Summary of Contributions and Index of Exhibits. Here's the complete workflow:

Evidence Collection → Review → Reputation Analysis → SOC Generation → Refinement

Let's walk through each step in detail:


Step 1: Complete Evidence Collection (1-3 hours)

Before using the SoCKit, you must upload all your supporting evidence.

What you need to prepare: Supporting documents in 14 categories

Core Categories (Most Important):

  1. Personal Information

    • CV/Resume

    • Passport

    • Diplomas/Degrees

    • I-94 (if in U.S.)

    • Educational equivalency evaluation (if degree is from outside U.S.)

  2. Publications & Citations 📚

    • Published papers

    • Patents

    • Google Scholar profile (can provide URL) - We have a Citation Highlight tool to simplify this whole process!

    • Citation metrics/reports

  3. Awards & Honors 🏆

    • Award certificates

    • Recognition letters

    • Competition results

    • Fellowship letters

  4. Funding & Grants 💰

    • Grant award notices

    • PI (Principal Investigator) letters

    • Research funding documentation

  5. Media Coverage 📰

    • Press mentions

    • News articles (can provide URLs)

    • Interviews

    • Featured articles about your work

Additional Strong Categories:

  1. Judging/Reviewing 👨‍⚖️

    • Peer review invitations

    • Conference reviewer certificates

    • Journal editorial board letters

  2. Memberships & Certifications 📜

    • Professional association memberships

    • Licenses

    • Certifications

  3. Presentations & Talks 🎤

    • Invited talk invitations

    • Conference presentation evidence

    • Seminar announcements

  4. Adoptions & Implementations 🚀

    • Technology transfer agreements

    • Commercial use evidence

    • Industry adoption letters

  5. High Salary 💵

    • W-2s showing 90th percentile salary for your field

    • Pay stubs

    • Salary verification letters

  6. Employment & Critical Roles 💼

    • Employment verification letters

    • Leadership position documentation

    • Critical role descriptions

  7. Other Supporting Materials 📎

    • Any additional relevant evidence

How to upload:

  • One-by-one: System guides you through each category

  • Batch upload: Upload multiple files at once (even zip files!)

  • URLs: Paste links to LinkedIn, Google Scholar, news articles - system downloads them automatically

What happens after each upload:

  • System automatically categorizes your document

  • Analyzes prestigious entities (conferences, journals, awards)

  • May automatically search online for reputation evidence

  • Shows progress: ✅ (complete), 📁 (in progress), ⏳ (pending)

Tip: The more complete your evidence, the stronger your SOC! Don't rush this phase.


Step 2: Complete Review Phase (15 minutes)

After uploading all evidence:

  1. The system shows a summary of all collected evidence

  2. Review which categories have documents and which are empty

  3. The system identifies any critical gaps in your evidence

  4. Add any missing documents if needed

  5. The system validates evidence completeness - checks if you have enough for a strong petition

What to check:

  • Do I have at least 5-7 strong evidence categories?

  • Are my most important achievements documented?

  • Do I have citation metrics uploaded?

  • Are prestigious awards and grants documented?

  1. When ready, say: "Ready to do reputation analysis"


Step 3: Complete Reputation Analysis (10 minutes)

The system automatically searches the internet for reputation evidence:

What it searches for:

  • 🏆 Prestige and ranking of conferences you've published in

  • 📚 Impact factors of journals where you've published

  • 🎖️ Reputation and selectivity of awards/honors you've received

  • 🏛️ Recognition and ranking of institutions you're affiliated with

  • 👥 Reputation of professional associations you're a member of

What happens:

  1. System performs automated searches (takes ~10 minutes)

  2. Creates supplementary evidence documents with reputation data

  3. Saves these to your evidence collection automatically

  4. Shows you the findings

Your role:

  • Review the reputation findings

  • Provide additional context if you have more information

  • Confirm when ready to proceed


Step 4: Trigger SOC Generation (1 click)

Now you're ready to generate your SOC!

How to trigger:

  1. Make sure you've completed Review and Reputation Analysis

  2. In the chat, say one of these:

    • "I'm ready to generate my Summary of Contributions"

    • "Generate SOC"

    • "Ready for SOC generation"

    • "I'm ready for SoC"

What happens next:

  • System confirms it's starting SOC generation

  • Reminds you that generated SoC and Index of Exhibits will be in workspace root folder

  • Notes that regeneration will overwrite previous versions


Step 5: Wait for Generation (5 minutes)

The SoCKit now works its magic!

Wait indicator: You'll see the system is working. Don't interrupt! Let it complete the full generation.


Step 6: Review the Generated Documents (15-30 minutes)

Once generation is complete, you'll have two new documents in your workspace:

Document 1: Index of Exhibits

Location: Workspace root folder Filename: "Index of Exhibits.md"

What to review:

  • ✅ Are all your uploaded documents listed?

  • ✅ Is the exhibit numbering correct? (Exhibit 3-1, 3-2, 3-3...)

  • ✅ Are exhibits organized by the 14 categories?

  • ✅ Are titles accurate?

  • ✅ Are any exhibits missing or duplicated?

Example structure:

# Index of Exhibits  ## Exhibit 1: Personal Information & Identification - Exhibit 1-1: Curriculum Vitae - Exhibit 1-2: Passport - Exhibit 1-3: Ph.D. Diploma  ## Exhibit 3: Publications & Citations - Exhibit 3-1: "AI for Medical Imaging" - Nature Medicine (2022) - Exhibit 3-2: "Drug Discovery with ML" - Cell (2021) - Exhibit 3-3: Google Scholar Citation Metrics  [... continues for all categories with evidence ...]

Document 2: Summary of Contributions

Location: Workspace root folder Filename: "Summary of Contributions.md"

What to review:

  • Introduction: Does it accurately describe your background and field?

  • Research Contributions: Are research themes logical? Are key papers highlighted?

  • Citation Impact: Are your metrics (h-index, total citations) correct?

  • Leadership: Are your judging/reviewing/membership activities covered?

  • Awards & Grants: Are all major awards described with prestige emphasis?

  • Media & Implementations: Are real-world impacts highlighted?

  • Conclusion: Does it tie everything together compellingly?

  • Citations: Does every claim have an exhibit reference (Exhibit X-Y)?

  • Prestige: Are venue rankings, impact factors, award selectivity emphasized?

Read critically: Would a USCIS officer be convinced by this narrative?


Step 7: Refine with AI Editor (30 minutes - 1 hour)

After reviewing, you'll likely want to make improvements. This is normal and expected! Use the AI Editor to refine your documents.

What is the AI Editor? The AI Editor is a powerful tool that helps you refine and improve your Summary of Contributions and Index of Exhibits through natural conversation.

How to use the AI Editor:

  1. Open either document (Index of Exhibits or Summary of Contributions) in the editor

  2. Use the AI Editor Chatbox to start making refinements

  3. Tell the AI Editor what changes you want in plain language

  4. The AI Editor will make the changes directly to your document

  5. Review the changes and continue refining as needed

Common refinement requests:

🔍 Add more emphasis:

  • "Can you emphasize my Nature Medicine paper more? It has 500+ citations."

  • "The NSF CAREER section should highlight that it's only 20% success rate."

  • "Add more details about my FDA-approved algorithm - this is my strongest evidence."

📝 Reorganize content:

  • "Reorganize research contributions into these themes: (A) Medical Imaging, (B) Drug Discovery, (C) Clinical AI"

  • "Move the high salary section earlier - it's strong evidence."

  • "Combine the media coverage and implementations sections."

➕ Add missing information:

  • "Add comparison data showing my h-index is in the top 1% for my field."

  • "The introduction should emphasize AI's importance to U.S. healthcare more."

  • "Include that the IEEE Senior Membership requires peer nomination."

✏️ Correct inaccuracies:

  • "The total citations should be 12,500, not 12,000."

  • "Correct the conference name to 'NeurIPS' not 'NIPS'."

  • "My h-index is 45, not 42."

🔗 Strengthen connections:

  • "Connect my cancer detection work more explicitly to U.S. national health priorities."

  • "The conclusion should reference specific Executive Orders about AI in healthcare."

  • "Link my drug discovery work to NIH strategic priorities."

Example refinement conversation with AI Editor:

You: "I want to improve Section II.A about my medical imaging work"  AI Editor: "I'll help you improve that section. What specific changes would you like?"  You: "Expand the Nature Medicine paper paragraph to emphasize: - Journal impact factor: 87.24 (top 0.1% in clinical medicine) - 500+ citations in just 2 years - FDA approval based on this research (Exhibit 10-1)"  AI Editor: "I've updated Section II.A to include those details with proper emphasis on the prestigious venue and real-world FDA approval impact."

Step 8: Iterate Until Perfect (1-2 hours total)

Iteration process:

  1. AI Editor makes the requested changes directly in your document

  2. You review the updated document

  3. Find more improvements needed? Continue with the AI Editor in Step 7

  4. Repeat until you're satisfied

How many iterations?

  • Typical: 2-3 rounds of refinement

  • First draft: Usually 70-80% there

  • After 1st refinement: 85-90% there

  • After 2nd refinement: 95%+ there

  • After 3rd refinement: Attorney-ready!

Signs you're done:

  • ✅ Every claim is backed by exhibit citations

  • ✅ All numbers are accurate (citations, dates, awards)

  • ✅ Prestige is highlighted throughout (impact factors, acceptance rates, rankings)

  • ✅ Research themes are logical and well-organized

  • ✅ USCIS legal language is used appropriately

  • ✅ The narrative flows smoothly and tells your story compellingly

  • ✅ You'd be proud to send this to your immigration attorney

  • ✅ You believe a USCIS officer would be convinced


Step 9: Finalize and Save (5 minutes)

Once you're satisfied:

What to do:

  1. Download both documents from your workspace

  2. Save backup copies to your local computer

  3. Review one final time - print and read on paper if possible

  4. Share with your immigration attorney - they can now start working on your petition

  5. Use these documents as the foundation for your full petition package

What you have:

  • 📄 Index of Exhibits - Complete, organized reference guide

  • 📄 Summary of Contributions - Professional, attorney-ready narrative (15-30 pages)

  • 📁 All evidence organized - Categorized and numbered

  • ⚖️ Legal language used - USCIS-appropriate terminology throughout

  • 🎯 Ready for petition - Foundation document complete


What Makes a Strong Summary of Contributions?

✅ DO:

  1. Cite Every Claim

    • ❌ "The petitioner received prestigious awards"

    • ✅ "The petitioner received the NSF CAREER Award (Exhibit 4-1), MIT Technology Review Innovators Under 35 (Exhibit 4-2)..."

  2. Quantify Everything

    • ❌ "Published many papers"

    • ✅ "Published 50+ papers, including 15 in top-tier venues (Nature, Science, Cell) with 12,500+ total citations (Exhibit 3-4)"

  3. Highlight Prestige

    • ❌ "Published in Nature Medicine"

    • ✅ "Published in Nature Medicine (impact factor: 87.24, ranked #1 in clinical medicine, acceptance rate: 8%) - Exhibit 3-1"

  4. Show Impact

    • ❌ "Developed an AI algorithm"

    • ✅ "Developed an AI algorithm that received FDA approval and is now used in 500+ hospitals to screen 100,000+ patients annually (Exhibit 10-1)"

  5. Connect to National Interest

    • ❌ "Research in cancer detection"

    • ✅ "Research in cancer detection addresses critical U.S. healthcare challenge—cancer is the 2nd leading cause of death in the United States, affecting 1.9 million Americans annually (American Cancer Society, 2023)"

❌ DON'T:

  1. Never Fabricate

    • Don't claim awards you didn't receive

    • Don't inflate numbers

    • Don't assume institutions are prestigious without evidence

  2. Avoid Vague Language

    • ❌ "Well-known conference"

    • ✅ "NeurIPS conference (ranked #1 in AI by Google Scholar Metrics, 22% acceptance rate)"

  3. Don't Use First Person

    • ❌ "I published..."

    • ✅ "Dr. Chen published..." or "The petitioner published..."

  4. Don't Skip Citations

    • Every claim needs an exhibit reference

    • If you can't cite it, don't claim it

  5. Don't Be Emotional

    • ❌ "The petitioner is passionate about cancer research"

    • ✅ "The petitioner has contributed significantly to cancer detection research, as evidenced by..."


Common Questions

Q: Do immigration attorneys really require the SOC before starting? A: Yes! Most immigration attorneys need a complete SOC and Index of Exhibits before they can begin drafting your petition. Without these documents, they can't assess your case strength or draft the petition letter. This is why most petitioners without the SoCKit take months just to get started with their attorney. The SoCKit reduces this to 1-2 weeks.

Q: Can I use the SOC if I'm working with an immigration attorney? A: Absolutely! In fact, your attorney will appreciate receiving a well-organized, professional SOC. It saves them significant time and allows them to focus on legal strategy rather than evidence compilation. Many attorneys are impressed by the quality of SoCKit output. Just let them know you used an AI-assisted tool to organize your evidence.

Q: How long should my Summary of Contributions be? A: Typically 15-30 pages, depending on your career stage and evidence. Early career: 10-15 pages. Mid-career: 15-25 pages. Senior: 25-35 pages. Quality matters more than length.

Q: Can I regenerate if I don't like the first version? A: Yes! You can regenerate ad needed. However, regeneration overwrites the previous version, so review carefully and save any versions you want to keep.

Q: What if some categories have no evidence? A: That's normal! The SoCKit automatically skips categories with no evidence. You don't need all 14 categories—focus on your strongest 5-7 categories.

Q: Should I include everything or just highlights? A: Include ALL your evidence in the Index of Exhibits, but the Summary of Contributions should focus on your most significant contributions.

Q: How are research themes determined? A: The SoCKit analyzes your publication titles and summaries to detect 3-4 related research themes. If you want different groupings, just ask: "Can you reorganize research contributions by X, Y, Z themes?"

Q: What if the builder missed something important? A: Just point it out: "Can you add more detail about my FDA-approved algorithm (Exhibit 10-1)?" or "The NSF CAREER award section should emphasize the 20% success rate more."

Q: Can I edit the generated documents directly? A: Yes! You can edit them manually or use the AI Editor for intelligent refinements. The AI Editor is the recommended way because it understands the document structure and USCIS requirements. Simply open the document and click the AI Editor button to start making improvements through conversation.

Q: Can I use the SOC for different types of immigration petitions? A: Yes! The SoCKit can be used for various immigration petition types. You can adjust the language and emphasis based on your specific petition requirements:

  • Emphasize national importance and substantial merit for certain petition types

  • Emphasize extraordinary ability and sustained acclaim for others

  • The core structure and evidence-based approach works for all petition types


Tips for Success

  1. Don't Wait - Start Now!

    • The evidence collection phase is what takes most people months

    • Start uploading evidence as soon as you have it

    • Don't wait until you have "everything" - upload incrementally

    • The sooner you finish, the sooner your attorney can start working

  2. Upload High-Quality Evidence First

    • Better evidence → Better SOC

    • Include exhibit summaries that explain significance

    • Upload prestige documentation (conference rankings, journal impact factors)

  3. Review Citation Metrics Carefully

    • Make sure Google Scholar profile is up-to-date

    • Include h-index, i10-index, total citations

    • Note your most cited papers

  4. Document Everything

    • Award selectivity rates (if available)

    • Conference acceptance rates

    • Journal impact factors

    • Grant success rates

    • Employer/institution rankings

  5. Think About Narrative

    • Your research should tell a coherent story

    • Themes should connect logically

    • Show progression and depth of expertise

  6. Tailor to Your Petition Type

    • Connect your work to relevant legal standards

    • Show societal impact and national benefit

    • Highlight sustained acclaim and recognition

    • Demonstrate your unique qualifications

  7. Iterate and Refine

    • First version is rarely perfect

    • Request specific improvements

    • Read critically—would a USCIS officer be convinced?


Example Refinement Requests

After reviewing your SOC, you might say:

  • "The introduction should emphasize AI's importance to U.S. healthcare more strongly"

  • "Can you reorganize research contributions into: (A) Medical Imaging, (B) Drug Discovery, (C) Clinical Decision Support?"

  • "Add more details about the Nature Medicine paper's impact factor and citations"

  • "The NSF CAREER section needs to emphasize it's the most prestigious early-career award"

  • "Expand the FDA approval section—this is my strongest evidence of real-world impact"

  • "The conclusion should connect my work more explicitly to U.S. national interests"

  • "Can you add comparison data showing my h-index is in the top 1% for my field?"


Your SOC Journey: Timeline

Week 0: Evidence Collection (Most Critical!)

This is where most people get stuck for months without the builder.

Days 1-2: Core Documents

  • Upload CV, passport, diplomas

  • Upload all publications and patents

  • Add Google Scholar profile (use Citation Highlight tool!)

Days 3-4: Awards & Grants

  • Scan and upload award certificates

  • Upload grant award letters

  • Document funding amounts and selectivity

Days 5-6: Professional Activities

  • Upload peer review invitations

  • Add membership certificates

  • Document leadership roles

Day 7: Media & Impact

  • Add news articles (paste URLs!)

  • Upload technology transfer agreements

  • Document industry adoptions

Total: 1 week of active work (1-3 hours/day)

Week 1-2: SOC Generation & Refinement

Monday: Review & Reputation Analysis (25 minutes)

  • Review all collected evidence (15 min)

  • System performs reputation analysis (10 min)

Monday: SOC Generation (5 minutes)

  • Trigger SOC generation

  • Wait for both documents to be created

Monday-Tuesday: First Review (2 hours)

  • Read both documents carefully

  • Take notes on improvements needed

  • Request first round of refinements

Wednesday: Second Review (1 hour)

  • Review updated documents

  • Request additional refinements if needed

Thursday: Final Review (30 minutes)

  • Final read-through

  • Make last minor adjustments

  • Approve final version

Friday: Share with Attorney! 🎉

  • Download both documents

  • Send to your immigration attorney

  • They can now start working on your petition immediately!

The Alternative (Without SoCKit):

Month 1-2: Figuring out what evidence you need Month 3-4: Collecting and scanning documents Month 5-6: Organizing evidence by category Month 7-9: Writing draft SOC (most people struggle here) Month 10-12: Revising SOC multiple times Month 13+: Finally ready to share with attorney

Don't let this be you! Use the SoCKit and finish in 1-2 weeks.


Final Checklist Before Moving On

Before proceeding to the next phase, verify:

  • [ ] Index of Exhibits includes all your evidence

  • [ ] Every exhibit has proper numbering (Exhibit X-Y format)

  • [ ] Summary of Contributions covers all major achievements

  • [ ] Every claim in the Summary has an exhibit citation

  • [ ] Research contributions are organized logically

  • [ ] Prestige and reputation are highlighted throughout

  • [ ] All numbers are accurate (citations, awards, grants)

  • [ ] USCIS legal language is used appropriately

  • [ ] The narrative flows logically and tells your story

  • [ ] Your unique qualifications and achievements are clearly demonstrated


Your Summary of Contributions is the foundation of your petition. Take the time to get it right—it's worth it! 🎯

Did this answer your question?